Search for: "W. J. Giles" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2016, 12:11 pm by Giles Peaker
In Winch, Astill J held at paragraph 48 that the person with an interest in land which provides a right to possession indicates the ability to exercise control over it. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:51 am
When asked why he did that, the defendant replied, `[j]ust curiosity. . . .You know, at this point in time, I don't know why. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
It is clear from the decision in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47, [2015] 1 WLR 3250 and in particular paragraphs 39-40 that the Secretary of State should have had specific regard to the best interests of children in the position of W as a primary consideration when devising the Regulations. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Another example is the four year sentence and requirement to provide restitution to victims of more than $850,000 for the operator of J & W Construction, Inc that violated the Clean Air Act through illegal asbestos removal and disposal activities. [read post]